No products in the cart.
Gay rights groups seek order on employer bias
January 24, 2013 RSS Feed Print
By SAM HANANEL, Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) — Gay rights advocates are renewing their push for President Barack Obama to sign an executive order banning federal contractors from discriminating against gay employees.
The drive comes as Obama included an unexpected declaration of support for gay rights in his inaugural address Monday, saying, “Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law, for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well.”
Gay supporters hope his comments will lead to action on their agenda on behalf of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community.
Obama had frustrated many of his supporters last year when he declined to issue an executive order that would protect workers at companies with government contracts from bias based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
At the time, activists believed the administration was making a political decision based on the looming election. White House officials said Obama was waiting for Congress to pass broader legislation that would prohibit all employers from discriminating against gay workers.
“Getting past an election always uncomplicates things,” said Fred Sainz, a spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign, a leading gay rights advocacy group. “We intend to pick up the issue once again and ask the president to do this.”
Current federal law bans discrimination on the basis of sex, race and national origin, but it doesn’t stop an employer from firing or refusing to hire a worker based on sexual orientation.
White House spokesman Shin Inouye said this week that the Obama administration is not ready “at this time” to issue an executive order banning federal contractors from discriminating against gays.
The push for Obama to act comes as legal recognition of gay rights has gradually expanded: Twenty-one states and the District of Columbia ban employment discrimination based on sexual orientation. Nine states and D.C. have legalized same-sex marriage.
Later this year, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in two cases that could further expand gay marriage rights. Gay rights groups are hoping the administration files briefs in the case to argue that gay marriage is protected by the Constitution. Obama has so far insisted gay marriage is a state issue, and White House spokesman Jay Carney reaffirmed that stance Tuesday in response to questions about the president’s inaugural speech.
Gay supporters have been a loyal constituency for Obama, helping him raise millions for his re-election campaign. And they have been grateful for the president’s first-term decisions to back same-sex marriage and repeal the military’s “don’t ask don’t tell” policy, allowing gay soldiers to serve openly for the first time.
But job discrimination remains one of the last barriers for gay workers, and activists say it’s unrealistic to expect Congress — with a Republican-controlled House — to revise discrimination laws anytime soon. Those efforts have failed to make headway in Congress for more than a decade.
In the meantime, an executive order banning discrimination by federal contractors would affect more than 20 percent of the workforce — about 16 million workers. And some advocates believe an executive order could provide the spark that gets Congress to act.
“There’s clear research that shows LGBT people face high rates of discrimination in the workplace, and we need to pursue every possible policy solution to that problem,” said Jeff Krehely, vice president of LGBT research at the liberal-leaning Center for American Progress.
Randel Johnson, vice president at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for labor issues, said business owners might have some concerns with an executive order, depending on how it was drafted, with new paperwork and enforcement requirements.
“Executive orders are often enforced through the severe sanction of debarment from federal contracts, so they must be carefully and narrowly structured,” Johnson said.
Otherwise, the Chamber has taken no official position on congressional efforts to pass broader legislation prohibiting discrimination against gay workers.