The Supreme Court Just Admitted It’s Going to Rule in Favor of Marriage Equality – The Supreme Court Just Admitted It’s Going to Rule in Favor of Marriage Equality

By Mark Joseph Stern

Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Clarence Thomas as they depart the Red Mass on Oct. 5, 2014.
Photo byJonathan Ernst/Reuters

Early Monday morning, the Supreme Court refused to stay a federal judge’s order invalidating Alabama’s ban on same-sex marriage. In doing so, the justices immediately set up a constitutional crisis between the state’s lawless chief justice and the federal judiciary. They also effectively admitted what court-watchers have suspected for months: The court is preparing to rule in favor of nationwide marriage equality at the end of this term.

Here’s how Monday’s decision reveals the justices’ intention to strike down gay marriage bans across the country. Typically, the justices will stay any federal court ruling whose merits are currently under consideration by the Supreme Court. Under normal circumstances, that is precisely what the court would have done here: The justices will rule on the constitutionality of state-level marriage bans this summer, so they might as well put any federal court rulings on hold until they’ve had a chance to say the last word. After all, if the court ultimately ruled against marriage equality, the Alabama district court’s order would be effectively reversed, and those gay couples who wed in the coming months would find their unions trapped in legal

But that is not what the court did here. Instead, seven justices agreed, without comment, that the district court’s ruling could go into effect, allowing thousands of gay couples in Alabama to wed. That is not what a court that planned to rule against marriage equality would do. By permitting these marriages to occur, the justices have effectively tipped their hand, revealing that any lower court’s pro-gay ruling will soon be affirmed by the high court itself.

Don’t believe me? Then ask Justice Clarence Thomas, who, along with Justice Antonin Scalia, dissented from Monday’s denial of a stay. (Oddly—and perhaps tellingly—Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, two other foes of marriage equality, didn’t bother to join Thomas’ dissent.) The court’s “acquiescence” to gay marriage in Alabama, Thomas wrote, “may well be seen as a signal of the Court’s intended resolution” of the constitutionality of gay marriage bans. Thomas and Scalia meant this to be a grave warning. The rest of us, however, should take it as a white flag—and a cause for celebration.

Proposition Love Jewelry Celebrates New Jersey’s First Year of Gay Marriage Doubling Charitable Proceeds

Proposition Love Jewelry Celebrates New Jersey’s First Year of Gay Marriage

Doubling Charitable Proceeds


14K Yellow Gold LOVE Ring
14K Yellow Gold LOVE Ring


“Congratulations, New Jersey, on your upcoming first year of Marriage Equality!” said Proposition Love co-founder Sam Street. “We are thrilled to honor this occasion with a14K Gold LOVE Ring  for the month of October that is as stylish and beautiful as the Garden State itself and donate even more money to LGBT causes.”


“As each state, one-by-one, passes Marriage Equality, we honor it by naming a new and uniquely-designed wedding band after it and adding the ring to our Countdown Collection,” explains co-founder Jonathan Tack. “We are proud to have New Jersey’s ring as the fourteenth addition to the collection and look forward to the day when all 50 states, along with the District of Columbia, are represented.”


Proposition Love Jewelry was founded in 2011 by jewelry industry veterans Sam Street and Jonathan Tack, a legally married couple.  Jewelry from Proposition Love is a symbol of LOVE and COMMITMENT to one another and a pledge to support the RIGHTS of ALL.  Proposition Love Jewelry proudly donates 10 percent of profits to organizations that support Marriage Equality, Gay Rights, LGBT Youth and Anti Bullying, and HIV / AIDS activism.    Learn more about the entire line of Proposition Love Jewelry at:


#   #   #